Learn about the processes we go trough to help your company
View Our Case Studies
Specific Case Studies
Explore our case studies to see how we tailor solutions to meet your unique needs.
Report of Audit requirements
Explore the key requirements for each specific standard.
Customized questionaires
Find examples tailored questionaires based on specific standards fulfillment needs.
Case Study: ISO 9001
Client: Manufacturing Company
Industry: Manufacturing
Challenge: Maintaining ISO 9001 compliance and streamlining internal audit processes.
Solution: Implementation of the Aievas self-audit software tool.
Background:
A mid-sized manufacturing company was struggling to manage its compliance with ISO 9001 standards. Their audit process was largely manual, leading to inefficiencies, errors, and a high level of resource use. The company wanted to automate and streamline its internal audit processes while ensuring full compliance with ISO 9001 and other regulatory standards.
Objectives:
- Automate the internal audit process to reduce time and resources.
- Ensure full compliance with ISO 9001 standards.
- Improve audit accuracy and reduce human errors.
- Provide detailed reporting for continuous improvement and compliance tracking.
Solution:
The company adopted Aievas, a self-audit software tool known for its customizable audit checklists, real-time tracking, and comprehensive reporting capabilities. Aievas was configured to meet the specific needs of the company’s ISO 9001 requirements.
Implementation:
- Customization of Checklists: Aievas was tailored to match the company’s specific ISO 9001 criteria, ensuring that all required standards were covered in every audit.
- Automation of Audit Tasks: The manual data collection process was replaced by automated checklists and real-time tracking, significantly reducing the time spent on each audit.
- Real-Time Monitoring: The platform provided live updates on audit progress, allowing the compliance team to immediately address any non-conformities or issues as they arose.
- Comprehensive Reporting: Aievas generated detailed reports at the end of each audit cycle, highlighting areas for improvement and offering a clear overview of compliance status.
Results:
- Efficiency Increase: The company reduced audit time by 40%, allowing the team to focus on more strategic tasks.
- Compliance Improvement: Aievas helped the company maintain 100% compliance with ISO 9001 standards, reducing the risk of non-conformities.
- Enhanced Reporting: Detailed reports provided the management team with actionable insights, enabling continuous process improvement.
- Cost Savings: By automating the audit process, the company saved on labor costs and minimized errors, leading to a significant return on investment.
Audit Requirements for ISO 9001: 2015
The ISO 9001:2015 standard includes specific auditing requirements to ensure compliance with its principles of a quality management system. Here are the key audit-related areas:
Internal Audits
The organization must conduct internal audits at planned intervals to determine whether the QMS conforms to the requirements of ISO 9001 and whether it is effectively implemented and maintained. The audits should cover:
- Compliance with QMS processes and procedures.
- The effectiveness of QMS implementation and maintenance.
- Corrective actions taken to address any non-conformities identified.
Audit Planning
The audit process should be planned and take into consideration the importance of processes, changes impacting the organization, and the results of previous audits. Audit criteria and scope must be defined clearly.
Corrective Actions
After an audit, any non-conformities must be documented, and corrective actions should be implemented to address the root causes of those issues. The effectiveness of corrective actions should also be monitored.
Reporting and Management Review
Audit findings must be reported to management for review. Top management is responsible for reviewing the audit outcomes and ensuring that appropriate actions are taken to continually improve the QMS.
Continual Improvement
The organization must show evidence of continual improvement in its QMS, driven by internal audits, management reviews, and corrective actions.
Custom Questionaire
Section 1: Context of the Organization
- Has the organization identified its internal and external issues that affect the ability to achieve its intended QMS outcomes?
- Have the needs and expectations of interested parties (customers, regulators, etc.) been determined and documented?
- Is the scope of the QMS clearly defined and appropriate to the organization’s purpose and strategic direction?
Section 2: Leadership
- Is top management committed to the QMS and actively promoting continual improvement?
- Are quality objectives aligned with the organization’s strategic goals and communicated effectively across the organization?
- Has a quality policy been established, implemented, and maintained, and is it understood by all employees?
Section 3: Planning
- Are risks and opportunities related to the QMS identified and documented?
- Are quality objectives measurable, monitored, and updated as necessary?
- Are there plans in place to address potential changes and their impact on the QMS?
Section 4: Support
- Are sufficient resources (human, infrastructure, and environment) available to support the QMS?
- Are all employees competent based on their education, training, and experience?
- Are documented information and records effectively controlled to ensure they are accessible and maintained?
Section 5: Operation
- Are processes for product and service delivery planned, implemented, and controlled to ensure quality standards are met?
- Is there a system in place to communicate with customers regarding their requirements, feedback, and complaints?
- Are corrective actions taken when non-conformities arise during operations?
Section 6: Performance Evaluation
- Are internal audits conducted regularly to ensure the QMS is functioning effectively?
- Are non-conformities and opportunities for improvement identified, documented, and acted upon?
- Is management reviewing QMS performance and improvement opportunities regularly?
Section 7: Improvement
- Is there a process for identifying and addressing non-conformities to prevent recurrence?
- Are continual improvement activities implemented to enhance QMS performance?
- Is customer satisfaction regularly measured and considered in improvement activities?
Case Study: ISO 45001
Client: Construction Company
Industry: Construction
Challenge: Ensuring compliance with ISO 45001 (Occupational Health and Safety Management System) and improving workplace safety through more efficient audits.
Solution: Implementation of Aievas self-audit software to manage safety audits and compliance.
Background:
A mid-sized construction company had challenges maintaining compliance with ISO 45001 standards, which focus on health and safety management. Given the high-risk nature of their work, ensuring workplace safety was a top priority. However, their audit process was manual and error-prone, leading to missed compliance checks, inconsistent reporting, and safety risks.
Objectives:
- Automate the occupational health and safety audit process.
- Ensure full compliance with ISO 45001 requirements.
- Improve tracking and management of workplace risks and incidents.
- Provide detailed, actionable reports for safety improvements.
Solution:
The company implemented Aievas, which was configured to align with ISO 45001 requirements. The software was designed to automate safety audits, track workplace incidents, and generate comprehensive reports on health and safety compliance.
Implementation:
- Customization for ISO 45001: Aievas was set up with customized checklists to meet all ISO 45001 requirements, covering risk assessments, incident tracking, safety training, and employee health monitoring.
- Automated Safety Audits: Routine safety inspections were automated, with real-time data collection and incident logging. The system ensured that audits were conducted on schedule, minimizing human error.
- Incident and Risk Management: The software allowed the team to log and track workplace accidents and near-miss incidents, ensuring that all safety issues were documented and addressed.
- Comprehensive Reporting: Aievas provided detailed reports on workplace safety, allowing management to monitor compliance, identify recurring issues, and implement corrective actions promptly.
Results:
- Improved Compliance: The company achieved 100% compliance with ISO 45001 within six months of using Aievas, significantly reducing safety risks and ensuring adherence to global health and safety standards.
- Risk Reduction: Incident reporting and tracking became more efficient, leading to a 30% reduction in workplace accidents over the first year of implementation.
- Increased Efficiency: Automated audits reduced time spent on safety inspections by 50%, allowing the safety team to focus on proactive risk management.
- Actionable Insights: The detailed reports generated by Aievas provided management with clear insights into safety performance, enabling continuous improvements in the company’s health and safety processes.
Conclusion:
By adopting Aievas, the construction company streamlined its compliance with ISO 45001, resulting in improved workplace safety, fewer incidents, and a more efficient audit process. The system’s automation and real-time monitoring allowed the company to take proactive steps toward creating a safer work environment, ensuring the well-being of its employees while maintaining compliance with international standards.
Auditing Requirements for ISO 45001
Context of the Organization:
The organization must demonstrate an understanding of its internal and external OHS risks and regulatory landscape. It must establish an OHS management system based on this context.
Leadership and Worker Participation:
Leadership must show clear commitment to OHS policies. Workers should participate in developing and maintaining the OHS management system.
Planning for the OHS Management System:
The organization should assess and plan for hazards, risks, and opportunities related to OHS. This includes creating measurable OHS objectives and ensuring compliance with legal requirements.
Support:
Adequate resources (financial, technical, and human) must be allocated to support the OHS management system. Training and communication plans should be implemented to ensure all employees are aware of their OHS responsibilities.
Operation:
This requires controlling risks by setting up operational controls and emergency preparedness plans. Risk mitigation must extend to contractors and visitors.
Performance Evaluation:
The organization must regularly monitor, measure, and evaluate the performance of its OHS system. This includes internal audits and management reviews of OHS performance.
Improvement:
Continuous improvement must be a key element, with the organization required to take corrective actions after incidents and identify ways to improve the system’s overall effectiveness.
Costum Questionaire
Section 1: Context of the Organization
- Have the internal and external issues affecting OHS been identified?
- Are the needs and expectations of workers and other interested parties clearly defined?
- Has the scope of the OHS management system been determined?
Section 2: Leadership and Worker Participation
- Does top management demonstrate leadership and commitment to the OHS management system?
- Are roles and responsibilities for OHS management clearly assigned and communicated?
- Are workers actively involved in safety committees or decision-making processes regarding health and safety?
- Is there an established OHS policy that aligns with the organization’s context?
Section 3: Planning
- Have all potential hazards been identified, and has a risk assessment been conducted?
- Are the OHS objectives consistent with the OHS policy and are they measurable?
- Are there mechanisms in place to address risks and opportunities related to health and safety?
- Does the organization comply with all legal and regulatory OHS requirements?
Section 4: Support
- Are adequate resources provided to ensure the effective implementation of the OHS management system?
- Have workers received appropriate OHS training?
- Is there effective communication of the OHS policy and objectives within the organization?
- Are necessary documents, procedures, and records maintained as part of the OHS management system?
Section 5: Operation
- Are there procedures to control activities that pose OHS risks?
- Are risk mitigation measures in place for contractors, suppliers, and visitors?
- Is there an emergency preparedness and response plan?
- Are operational controls established to eliminate or reduce OHS hazards?
Section 6: Performance Evaluation
- Are regular internal audits conducted to evaluate OHS management system performance?
- Is compliance with OHS regulations monitored and measured?
- Are non-conformities identified, and are corrective actions taken promptly?
- Is incident investigation and reporting carried out effectively?
Section 7: Improvement
Section 1: Context of the Organization
- Have the internal and external issues affecting OHS been identified?
- Are the needs and expectations of workers and other interested parties clearly defined?
- Has the scope of the OHS management system been determined?
Section 2: Leadership and Worker Participation
- Does top management demonstrate leadership and commitment to the OHS management system?
- Are roles and responsibilities for OHS management clearly assigned and communicated?
- Are workers actively involved in safety committees or decision-making processes regarding health and safety?
- Is there an established OHS policy that aligns with the organization’s context?
Section 3: Planning
- Have all potential hazards been identified, and has a risk assessment been conducted?
- Are the OHS objectives consistent with the OHS policy and are they measurable?
- Are there mechanisms in place to address risks and opportunities related to health and safety?
- Does the organization comply with all legal and regulatory OHS requirements?
Section 4: Support
- Are adequate resources provided to ensure the effective implementation of the OHS management system?
- Have workers received appropriate OHS training?
- Is there effective communication of the OHS policy and objectives within the organization?
- Are necessary documents, procedures, and records maintained as part of the OHS management system?
Section 5: Operation
- Are there procedures to control activities that pose OHS risks?
- Are risk mitigation measures in place for contractors, suppliers, and visitors?
- Is there an emergency preparedness and response plan?
- Are operational controls established to eliminate or reduce OHS hazards?
Section 6: Performance Evaluation
- Are regular internal audits conducted to evaluate OHS management system performance?
- Is compliance with OHS regulations monitored and measured?
- Are non-conformities identified, and are corrective actions taken promptly?
- Is incident investigation and reporting carried out effectively?
Section 7: Improvement
- Are opportunities for continual improvement of the OHS management system regularly identified?
- Are corrective actions reviewed and their effectiveness monitored?
- Is there a process to learn from past incidents and integrate improvements into future planning?